<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Affinity Spaces and Learning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.learninginvideogames.com/general/affinity-spaces-and-learning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.learninginvideogames.com/general/affinity-spaces-and-learning/</link>
	<description>Videogame research, educational video games, learning in video games</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:24:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affinity spaces, secondary orality &#38; digital epistemologies. &#124; dougbelshaw.com/blog</title>
		<link>http://www.learninginvideogames.com/general/affinity-spaces-and-learning/comment-page-1/#comment-1114</link>
		<dc:creator>Affinity spaces, secondary orality &#38; digital epistemologies. &#124; dougbelshaw.com/blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.learninginvideogames.com/general/affinity-spaces-and-learning/#comment-1114</guid>
		<description>[...] This post is to summarize what I&#8217;ve been learning (and attempting to synthesize) about so-called &#8216;affinity spaces&#8217;, &#8217;secondary orality&#8217; and &#8216;digital epistemologies&#8217;. Much of the following comes from, or was thinking provoked by, Lankshear and Knobel&#8217;s New Literacies (2006). My notes on the books and articles mentioned, as ever, are available at dougbelshaw.com/wiki.  Literacy is all about communication. Literacy therefore is all about creating or reading texts for a particular purpose. This doesn&#8217;t change when we move into the realm of &#8216;digital literac(ies)&#8217;. It was Gee (2004) who came up with notion of &#8216;affinity spaces&#8217;. These spaces are characterized by the following elements (taken from this useful post): [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post is to summarize what I&#8217;ve been learning (and attempting to synthesize) about so-called &#8216;affinity spaces&#8217;, &#8217;secondary orality&#8217; and &#8216;digital epistemologies&#8217;. Much of the following comes from, or was thinking provoked by, Lankshear and Knobel&#8217;s New Literacies (2006). My notes on the books and articles mentioned, as ever, are available at dougbelshaw.com/wiki.  Literacy is all about communication. Literacy therefore is all about creating or reading texts for a particular purpose. This doesn&#8217;t change when we move into the realm of &#8216;digital literac(ies)&#8217;. It was Gee (2004) who came up with notion of &#8216;affinity spaces&#8217;. These spaces are characterized by the following elements (taken from this useful post): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

